Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cleon Fernandes's avatar

I believe I understand your reasoning behind the one developer taking SM accountability, but it doesn't seem correct. Have you seen that work? I've been there juggling accountabilities between Dev vs SM, it's a path to misery.

As suggested by your LM definition, SM accountability should go to LM, who is actually empowered to pave the Team's road. Ryan Ripley would also agree with LM taking SM accontability: https://www.scrum.org/resources/blog/your-next-scrum-master-should-be-your-manager

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts